No bill definitions
Word backwards | on llib |
---|---|
Part of speech | The part of speech of the word "no" is a determiner (specifically a negative determiner), and "bill" is a noun. |
Syllabic division | no - bill |
Plural | The plural of the word "no bill" is "no bills." |
Total letters | 6 |
Vogais (2) | o,i |
Consonants (3) | n,b,l |
When referring to a "no bill," it typically pertains to a legal term that signifies the decision not to indict or prosecute a defendant. It is often used by a grand jury when they determine that there is insufficient evidence to bring criminal charges against an individual.
Legal Terminology
In the realm of law, a no bill essentially means that the grand jury, after reviewing the evidence presented by the prosecutor, has decided not to issue an indictment. This decision indicates that there is not enough proof to move forward with a criminal case against the accused.
Grand Jury Process
During a grand jury proceeding, prosecutors present evidence and call witnesses to testify in order to establish probable cause for the charges being considered. If the grand jury does not find enough evidence to support the charges, they may return a no bill decision, effectively ending the process.
Implications
For the defendant, a no bill decision can be a relief, as it means they will not face criminal charges in relation to the specific case under review. However, it is essential to note that a no bill does not equate to an exoneration or declaration of innocence. It merely indicates a lack of evidence to proceed.
Overall, the concept of a no bill is a crucial aspect of the legal system, ensuring that individuals are not unjustly prosecuted without sufficient evidence to support the charges brought against them.
No bill Examples
- The jury returned a no bill verdict, clearing the defendant of all charges.
- The prosecutor decided not to pursue the case further after the grand jury issued a no bill.
- The no bill decision came as a surprise to many, as the evidence against the suspect seemed strong.
- After reviewing the case, the district attorney determined that there was insufficient evidence to proceed and requested a no bill from the grand jury.
- The defense attorney argued for a no bill, claiming that the charges were based on hearsay and speculation.
- The no bill ruling was seen as a victory for the defendant, who had maintained their innocence throughout the trial.
- Despite the police department's efforts, the grand jury returned a no bill, much to the disappointment of the victim's family.
- The no bill decision was met with protests outside the courthouse, with many calling for a retrial.
- The judge agreed with the defense's motion for a no bill, citing a lack of credible witnesses.
- The no bill outcome raised questions about the reliability of the evidence presented in court.