King's evidence definitions
| Word backwards | s'gnik ecnedive |
|---|---|
| Part of speech | The part of speech of the term "king's evidence" is a noun. |
| Syllabic division | king's evidence Syllable separation: king's ev-i-dence |
| Plural | The plural of "king's evidence" is "king's evidences." |
| Total letters | 13 |
| Vogais (2) | i,e |
| Consonants (7) | k,n,g,s,v,d,c |
King's Evidence: Understanding the Legal Term
King's evidence, also known as crown's evidence or queen's evidence, refers to the testimony given by an accomplice or participant in a crime who agrees to cooperate with the prosecution in exchange for leniency or immunity. This legal term is often used in criminal cases to secure convictions against other individuals involved in the criminal activity.
How King's Evidence Works
When someone agrees to provide king's evidence, they agree to testify against their co-conspirators or associates in exchange for a reduced sentence or the dropping of charges. This testimony is crucial in building a case against other individuals involved in the crime, as it provides firsthand accounts of the events that took place. The individual providing king's evidence is often seen as a credible witness due to their direct involvement in the criminal activity.
The Importance of King's Evidence in Criminal Cases
King's evidence plays a significant role in criminal cases where obtaining convictions may be challenging due to lack of substantial evidence or witnesses. By providing testimony from an individual directly involved in the crime, prosecutors can strengthen their case and increase the likelihood of securing convictions. Without king's evidence, some cases may go unresolved or result in acquittals due to insufficient proof.
Benefits and Risks of Providing King's Evidence
Individuals who agree to provide king's evidence may benefit from reduced sentences, immunity from prosecution, or other leniencies. However, there are risks involved in cooperating with the prosecution, such as potential backlash from co-conspirators or a tarnished reputation within the criminal community. It is essential for individuals considering king's evidence to weigh the potential benefits against the risks before deciding to cooperate.
Conclusion
In the legal system, king's evidence plays a crucial role in securing convictions and holding individuals accountable for their actions. By incentivizing cooperation with the prosecution, this practice helps uncover the truth and bring justice to victims of crimes. While providing king's evidence may come with risks, it remains a powerful tool in fighting against criminal activities and ensuring that perpetrators are brought to justice.
King's evidence Examples
- The prosecutor offered a plea deal in exchange for the defendant's king's evidence.
- The witness provided king's evidence against the mob boss in court.
- The detective convinced the informant to give king's evidence in the murder case.
- The prisoner decided to cooperate with the authorities as king's evidence in the corruption scandal.
- The suspect refused to give king's evidence despite being offered immunity.
- The judge considered the reliability of the king's evidence presented in trial.
- The defense attorney cross-examined the witness who had provided king's evidence.
- The police used the king's evidence to build a case against the drug traffickers.
- The convicted felon agreed to testify as king's evidence in hopes of reducing their sentence.
- The jury deliberated on the weight of the king's evidence in reaching a verdict.