Judiciable definitions
| Word backwards | elbaiciduj |
|---|---|
| Part of speech | The word "judiciable" is an adjective. |
| Syllabic division | ju-di-ci-a-ble |
| Plural | The plural of the word "judiciable" is "judiciables". |
| Total letters | 10 |
| Vogais (4) | u,i,a,e |
| Consonants (5) | j,d,c,b,l |
Judiciable refers to a matter that is capable of being judged or decided by a court of law. This term is often used in legal contexts to describe issues or disputes that are within the jurisdiction of a court to adjudicate upon.
Understanding Judiciable Matters
In legal terms, a judiciable matter is one that presents a real and substantial controversy that is appropriate for judicial resolution. This means that the issue must be concrete, specific, and ripe for a court to consider and render a decision.
Judiciable Controversies
Examples of judiciable controversies include disputes over contractual obligations, claims of civil rights violations, challenges to government actions, and issues involving property rights. These are all matters that can be brought before a court for resolution through legal proceedings.
The Importance of Judiciable Matters
Ensuring that matters are judiciable is crucial for upholding the rule of law and maintaining a fair and just legal system. By allowing individuals and entities to seek judicial review of their disputes, the courts play a vital role in resolving conflicts and interpreting the law.
Overall, the concept of judiciable matters underscores the importance of having a legal system that can address and resolve disputes in a just and impartial manner.
Judiciable Examples
- The case is judiciable because it involves a legal dispute between two parties.
- The judge found that the matter was judiciable and therefore could proceed to trial.
- The issue at hand was not judiciable as it did not fall within the court's jurisdiction.
- The contract contained a judiciable clause that outlined how disputes would be resolved.
- The court will determine if the claim is judiciable based on the evidence presented.
- The legal team argued that the case was judiciable and should be heard in court.
- The Constitution provides guidelines for judiciable matters that can be heard by the courts.
- The judge's decision to dismiss the case was based on lack of judiciability.
- The judiciable nature of the dispute required expert legal analysis.
- The appellate court overturned the ruling, stating that the case was not judiciable.