Line-item veto definitions
| Word backwards | meti-enil otev |
|---|---|
| Part of speech | The part of speech of the word "line-item veto" is a noun. |
| Syllabic division | line-i-tem ve-to |
| Plural | The plural of the word line-item veto is line-item vetoes. |
| Total letters | 12 |
| Vogais (3) | i,e,o |
| Consonants (5) | l,n,t,m,v |
What is a Line-Item Veto?
A line-item veto is a power granted to a political executive, such as a president or governor, to selectively veto certain provisions of a bill without rejecting the entire legislation. This allows the executive to eliminate specific parts of a bill, such as particular budget items or clauses, while signing the rest into law.
How Does Line-Item Veto Work?
When a bill is presented to the executive with line-item veto authority, they can choose to strike out individual line items or provisions that they deem unnecessary or inappropriate. The executive then signs the modified version of the bill, with the vetoed sections removed, effectively altering the original legislation.
The Purpose of Line-Item Veto
The primary purpose of a line-item veto is to allow the executive to remove specific elements of a bill that they consider wasteful or unconstitutional without having to veto the entire piece of legislation. This power is intended to provide greater control over government spending and to prevent the enactment of provisions that may be harmful or unnecessary.
Challenges and Controversies
While the line-item veto can be a useful tool for executives to control spending and eliminate objectionable provisions from bills, it has also faced criticism and legal challenges. Some argue that it gives too much power to the executive branch and disrupts the balance of power between the branches of government. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the potential for abuse and political manipulation with the use of the line-item veto.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the line-item veto is a valuable tool that allows political executives to target specific areas of legislation for veto while still enacting the remainder of the bill. While it can be a useful mechanism for controlling government spending and eliminating objectionable provisions, it also carries potential risks and challenges that must be carefully considered.
Line-item veto Examples
- The president exercised his line-item veto power to remove specific provisions from the budget bill.
- The governor used the line-item veto to eliminate unnecessary expenditures from the proposed legislation.
- The mayor employed the line-item veto to strike down a controversial clause in the city council's resolution.
- Congress debated the constitutionality of the line-item veto and its implications for the separation of powers.
- The line-item veto allows the chief executive to reject individual line items in a spending bill without vetoing the entire legislation.
- Opponents argue that the line-item veto gives too much power to the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch.
- Advocates contend that the line-item veto is essential for fiscal responsibility and controlling government spending.
- State governors in the United States have varying degrees of line-item veto authority depending on their state's constitution.
- The line-item veto was granted to the president in 1996 but was later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998.
- Some countries have adopted a modified version of the line-item veto to allow for greater flexibility in budget decisions.