Fallacy of composition meaning

The fallacy of composition is when the assumption is made that what is true for part of a whole is also true for the whole.


Fallacy of composition definitions

Word backwards ycallaf fo noitisopmoc
Part of speech Noun
Syllabic division fal-la-cy of com-po-si-tion
Plural The plural of the word "fallacy of composition" is "fallacies of composition."
Total letters 20
Vogais (3) a,o,i
Consonants (9) f,l,c,y,m,p,s,t,n

Fallacy of Composition

The fallacy of composition is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone assumes that what is true for part of a whole must also be true for the whole itself. This fallacy arises when one incorrectly infers that the characteristics of individual elements must apply to the entire group or system. In other words, it is erroneous to assume that something is true for the whole simply because it is true for its parts.

Example

An example of the fallacy of composition is the assumption that because each individual brick in a wall is lightweight, the entire wall must also be lightweight. This assumption fails to consider the collective impact of all the bricks together, which could result in a very heavy structure.

Impact

The fallacy of composition can lead to flawed reasoning, as it overlooks the complexity and interactions within a system or group. It can result in incorrect conclusions and faulty predictions, particularly in fields like economics, sociology, and environmental studies where understanding the relationships between parts and wholes is crucial.

Guarding Against the Fallacy

To avoid falling into the trap of the fallacy of composition, one needs to carefully analyze the relationships and interactions within a system. It is essential to consider how the parts of a whole come together to create emergent properties that may not be evident when looking at individual components in isolation.

In conclusion, the fallacy of composition highlights the importance of looking at the bigger picture and understanding how individual parts contribute to the characteristics of the whole. By being mindful of this fallacy, one can engage in more accurate and informed reasoning, leading to better decision-making and problem-solving.


Fallacy of composition Examples

  1. Just because one student in the class failed the exam, it doesn't mean that the entire class will fail too.
  2. The assumption that if one player in a team is great, then the whole team must be great is a fallacy of composition.
  3. Having one talented musician in a group doesn't guarantee that the entire group will be equally talented.
  4. Saying that if individual trees in the forest are healthy, then the entire forest is healthy is an example of the fallacy of composition.
  5. It's a fallacy of composition to believe that because each part of a machine is functioning well, the whole machine will function perfectly.
  6. Just because each ingredient in a recipe tastes good on its own, it doesn't necessarily mean the dish will also taste good.
  7. The fact that each student in the group project is diligent doesn't mean that the entire project will be successful.
  8. Assuming that if every member of a group is wealthy, then the entire group is wealthy is a fallacy of composition.
  9. It's a fallacy of composition to think that because every employee is skilled, the company as a whole will be successful.
  10. Believing that if each piece of a puzzle is easy, then the entire puzzle will be easy is an example of the fallacy of composition.


Most accessed

Search the alphabet

  • #
  • Aa
  • Bb
  • Cc
  • Dd
  • Ee
  • Ff
  • Gg
  • Hh
  • Ii
  • Jj
  • Kk
  • Ll
  • Mm
  • Nn
  • Oo
  • Pp
  • Qq
  • Rr
  • Ss
  • Tt
  • Uu
  • Vv
  • Ww
  • Xx
  • Yy
  • Zz
  • Updated 26/03/2024 - 17:27:09