Coram judice definitions
| Word backwards | maroc eciduj |
|---|---|
| Part of speech | Coram judice is a Latin phrase meaning "in the presence of a judge." In this phrase, "coram judice" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying the verb or action that is taking place in front of a judge. |
| Syllabic division | co-ram ju-di-ce |
| Plural | The plural of "coram judice" is "coram judices." |
| Total letters | 11 |
| Vogais (5) | o,a,u,i,e |
| Consonants (5) | c,r,m,j,d |
Understanding Coram Judice
Definition of Coram Judice
Coram judice is a legal term that refers to a situation where a case is being heard before a judge who has jurisdiction over the matter. In simple terms, it means that the case is being heard in the presence of a competent judge who has the authority to make decisions on the issues at hand.
Importance of Coram Judice
Coram judice is crucial in ensuring that legal proceedings are conducted fairly and in accordance with the law. When a case is heard coram judice, it means that the judge has the power to render a valid judgment on the matter, which can then be enforced by the appropriate authorities. This helps uphold the rule of law and ensures that justice is served.
Coram Judice vs. Ex Parte
It is important to distinguish between coram judice and ex parte proceedings. While coram judice refers to cases heard in the presence of a judge with jurisdiction, ex parte refers to cases where only one party is present before the court. Ex parte proceedings are typically used for emergency situations where immediate action is required, but they are not suitable for resolving disputes where all parties need to be present.
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, coram judice is a fundamental concept in the legal system that ensures cases are heard before a competent judge with the authority to make decisions. By understanding the importance of coram judice and its role in upholding the rule of law, we can appreciate the significance of conducting legal proceedings in a fair and transparent manner.
Coram judice Examples
- The judge made a decision coram judice, meaning he made the ruling while in the presence of the parties involved.
- The attorney argued that the case should be dismissed because the judge was not acting coram judice due to a conflict of interest.
- The jury was instructed to consider the evidence presented to them coram judice, without outside influence.
- The judge declared a mistrial after discovering that the jury had been exposed to information that was not presented coram judice.
- The defendant's attorney objected to the judge's decision, citing that it was made coram judice without proper consideration of all the facts.
- The witness was questioned extensively to ensure that their testimony was given coram judice and without coercion.
- The court reporter was tasked with accurately documenting everything said coram judice during the trial.
- The judge emphasized the importance of conducting themselves coram judice to all involved parties in the courtroom.
- The prosecutor was reprimanded for attempting to influence the jury's decision outside of what was presented coram judice.
- The case was appealed on the grounds that the initial ruling was not made coram judice and violated the defendant's rights.