Directed verdict meaning

Directed verdict definitions

A directed verdict is a ruling by a judge in a court case that takes the decision-making power away from the jury and resolves the case in favor of one party before the case goes to the jury for a verdict. This type of verdict is typically issued when the judge determines that the evidence presented by one party is so strong that no reasonable jury could reach a different conclusion.

When is a Directed Verdict Issued?

A directed verdict is typically issued after the plaintiff has presented all of their evidence and the judge determines that there is not enough evidence for the case to proceed to the jury. The judge essentially rules that based on the evidence presented, no reasonable jury could find in favor of the plaintiff.

Legal Standards for a Directed Verdict

For a judge to issue a directed verdict, they must apply a legal standard known as the "summary judgement standard." This standard requires the judge to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, typically the plaintiff. If, after viewing the evidence this way, the judge determines that there is no genuine issue of material fact, a directed verdict may be issued.

Effect of a Directed Verdict

When a directed verdict is issued, the case does not go to the jury for a verdict. Instead, the judge issues a final ruling in favor of one party. This can result in the case being dismissed or a judgment being entered in favor of one party. The party who did not receive the directed verdict may have the option to appeal the judge's decision.

In summary, a directed verdict is a powerful tool used by judges to end a case before it goes to the jury, typically when one party's evidence is so strong that no reasonable jury could reach a different conclusion. This ruling is based on the summary judgement standard and can have significant implications for the outcome of the case.

Directed verdict Examples

1. The defense attorney requested a directed verdict in favor of their client.
2. The judge granted a directed verdict, stating that the prosecution's evidence was insufficient.
3. The jury was instructed to consider a directed verdict of not guilty due to lack of evidence.
4. The plaintiff's attorney moved for a directed verdict at the close of the prosecution's case.
5. The judge denied the defendant's motion for a directed verdict, allowing the trial to continue.
6. After hearing the arguments, the judge decided to issue a directed verdict for the plaintiff.
7. The directed verdict handed down by the judge shocked both the defense and the prosecution.
8. The defense team was surprised when the judge announced a directed verdict in their favor.
9. The judge's decision to grant a directed verdict saved both parties time and resources.
10. The directed verdict brought the trial to an unexpected and abrupt conclusion.

Most accessed